Image: Wikimedia
BNN Summary
M.A. Baby, General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), has unequivocally stated the party's unwavering dedication to the INDIA bloc's expansive political and ideological struggle against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). This declaration comes amidst internal discussions within the opposition alliance, underscoring the CPI(M)'s resolve to confront what it perceives as the communal and anti-democratic agenda of the ruling dispensation. The statement highlights the critical ideological fault lines defining India's current political landscape.
In-Depth Analysis
New Delhi, India – M.A. Baby, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), recently articulated the party's staunch commitment to the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc's comprehensive political and ideological battle against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The statement, made on a Saturday, reaffirms the CPI(M)'s resolve to unite with other opposition parties in confronting the perceived communal and anti-people policies of the ruling alliance.
The CPI(M)'s adherence to this broader struggle is deeply rooted in its Marxist-Leninist ideology, which advocates for a 'people's democratic revolution' aimed at establishing socialism and communism in India. The party believes in transforming India's social and economic structures to improve the lives of its citizens, emphasizing social and economic equality, reducing wealth disparity, and championing the interests of workers, peasants, and marginalized communities. Historically, the CPI(M) has been a vocal proponent of land reforms, a signature policy implemented in states like Kerala and West Bengal, where it led democratically elected communist governments for extended periods. The party was founded in 1964, emerging from a split in the Communist Party of India due to ideological differences, quickly becoming a dominant force, particularly in West Bengal, Kerala, and Tripura.
Conversely, the BJP and RSS operate under the banner of Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology that seeks to define Indian identity and nationhood through Hindu culture. This ideology, articulated by figures like Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and M.S. Golwalkar, asserts that India is fundamentally a Hindu nation, often leading to policies and rhetoric that marginalize religious minorities and threaten the country's secular fabric. The RSS, a right-wing paramilitary volunteer organization founded in 1925, has strong ideological and organizational links with the BJP, acting as a grassroots mobilization network and providing ideological support. Critics argue that the BJP-RSS combine has introduced a radical shift in India's socio-political agenda, appealing to the majority community's sentiments while fostering a sense of insecurity among minorities.
M.A. Baby's emphasis on a 'broader political and ideological fight' signifies a confrontation that goes beyond mere electoral competition. It encapsulates a fundamental disagreement on the vision for India's future—a struggle between the secular, socialist principles espoused by the Left and the Hindu nationalist agenda promoted by the BJP and RSS. The CPI(M) maintains that the current government's policies undermine constitutional institutions, democratic rights, and the livelihoods of millions of Indians through issues like inflation and unemployment.
Despite this strong commitment, the INDIA bloc has faced internal challenges. Recent reports indicate friction within the alliance, particularly between the Congress and its regional partners like the CPI(M) and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). During recent state assembly elections, Congress leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, allegedly campaigned by accusing the CPI(M) of having an 'understanding' with the BJP in Kerala. These remarks prompted M.A. Baby to write a sharply worded letter to Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, seeking clarification and expressing concern over what he described as a 'systematic campaign' by the Congress leadership. Baby highlighted that such allegations undermine the trust and unity essential for the opposition alliance.
Similarly, the DMK boycotted a crucial INDIA bloc meeting on June 8, 2026, due to disagreements stemming from the Congress's decision to walk out of their alliance in Tamil Nadu and align with the TVK. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) also voiced dissatisfaction with the Congress over its unilateral decision-making regarding a Rajya Sabha nomination.
However, despite these internal fissures, 23 parties attended the June 8 meeting in New Delhi, where leaders stressed the need for closer coordination and decided to hold bi-monthly meetings. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh affirmed that the bloc remains united through its diversity, with the objective of presenting a united front against the BJP in future elections. The CPI(M) has made it clear that while it seeks explanations for disruptive campaigning against allies, it will continue to cooperate with the opposition parties in Parliament to fight against the BJP's policies. The party's political position, as articulated by Baby, remains consistent with the resolution adopted at its last Party Congress. This continued engagement signifies the CPI(M)'s belief that the overarching ideological battle against the BJP and RSS outweighs regional electoral rivalries, albeit with a call for greater internal coherence and respect among alliance partners.
How do you feel about this story?
